Legal Opinion
Schenck v. Edwards
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided February 1, 1996No. CY-94-3109-LRSPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, INTER ALIA
SUKO, United States Magistrate Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT are the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Ct. Rec. 55) and defendants’ motion to strike (Ct.Rec. 82).
This is a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action brought by an inmate at the Washington State Penitentiary (WSP). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se. The defendants are represented by Penelope Nerup, Esq., of the Washington State Attorney General’s Office.
Plaintiffs action involves three claims: 1) were plaintiffs constitutional rights violated by the confiscation of a draft pleading he…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re KrierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- In re the Personal Restraint of KrierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Barstow v. Kennebec County JailDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2000
- Giba v. CookDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
- Gleaves v. Rudd Medical ServicesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019