Legal Opinion
In Re Krier
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 20, 2001No. 45490-1-IPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
29 P.3d 720 (2001)
In re the Personal Restraint Petition of S.J. KRIER, Petitioner.
No. 45490-1-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
August 20, 2001.
Christopher Gibson, Nielsen Broman and Assoc., Seattle, for appellant.
Michael G. Ballnik, John S. Blonien, Wm. Andrew Meyers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Olympia, for respondent.
KENNEDY, J.
Due process requires fair notice of what conduct is prohibited before an inmate charged with a serious infraction can be deprived of good time in a prison disciplinary proceeding. Where an inmate claims lack of fair notice and is nevertheless found guilty of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Department of Corrections v. GoulsbyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- In Re GoulsbyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- In Re HigginsWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Personal Restraint of LelandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Nelson v. HaydenIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.