Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings (Daewoo)
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 18, 1985No. Misc. 84-217-PAPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PANNER, Chief Judge.
On March 12, 1984, a Federal Grand Jury in Portland, Oregon returned a thirty-two count indictment charging defendants with violating 18 U.S.C. §§ 332, 371, 1001, and 1503 in connection with the importation of steel from South Korea into the United States during 1980-82. The term of this grand jury is now ended. Then Chief Judge James M. Burns granted defendants’ motion for a change of venue to the Central District of California, 591 F.Supp. 157. On January 3, 1985 a superseding information was filed and Daewoo-Korea and Daewoo-America pleaded guilty to conspiring to make…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fund for Constitutional Government v. National Archives and Records ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- United States v. BaggotSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- U.S. Industries, Inc. v. United States District Court for the Southern District of California, CentraldivisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings, Gj-76-4 & Gj-75-3Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. GiampaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- United States v. BlackwellDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- In Re Potash Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
- In re December 1988 Term Grand Jury InvestigationDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1989