Legal Opinion
In Re Potash Antitrust Litigation
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 17, 1995No. MDL No. 981. Civ. No. 3-93-197PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
896 F.Supp. 916 (1995)
In re POTASH ANTITRUST LITIGATION.
MDL No. 981. Civ. No. 3-93-197.
United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division.
July 17, 1995.
MEMORANDUM ORDER
ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to a special assignment, made in accordance with the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), upon the Plaintiffs' informal request that we rule on the following two pretrial issues:
1. Did counsel for the Defendant Kalium ("Kalium") improperly instruct a witness, during the course…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Domingo v. New England Fish Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Kleiner v. First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- In Re School Asbestos LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Toney Anaya and Elaine Anaya v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cox Nuclear Medicine v. Gold Cup Coffee Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2003
- Jones v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2008