Legal Opinion

United States v. Blackwell

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided January 21, 1997No. Criminal 95-671 (AJL)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LECHNER, District Judge.

The Grand Jury (the “Grand Jury”) returned a fifty-three count indictment (the “Indictment”) on 6 December 1996 against defendants Dorothy Blackwell (“Blackwell”) and Charles McNeil (“McNeil”) (collectively, the “Defendants”), charging embezzlement, 18 U.S.C. § 656, fifty-one counts of money laundering, 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(l)(B)(i) (“Section 1956(a)(l)(B)(i)”) and conspiracy to commit money laundering, 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h) (“Section 1956(h)”). The Grand Jury filed a superseding indictment (the “Superseding Indictment”) on 22 May 1996 and a second superseding…

2Cases cited169 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Paul F. PolishanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  2. State v. Joseph Diorio (069597)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  3. State v. Jacqueline D. Vickers & William BooneTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. C.S.A.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Condus v. Howard Savings BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API