Legal Opinion

Common Condominium Associations, Inc. v. Common Associates

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 31, 1984No. 11322PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiffs have appealed from the orders of the trial court granting the defendants’ motion to dissolve or modify a prejudgment remedy, an ex parte real estate attachment, which had been granted against them, and denying the plaintiffs’ motion to modify the prejudgment remedy “by increasing the amount of the attachment and/or by ordering the defendants . . .” to establish an escrow account.1 The plaintiffs request from this court an order directing that the trial court establish an escrow fund under General Statutes § 47-74d in the amount of $1,609,430.05 and issue an attachment in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ledgebrook Condominium Assn., Inc. v. Lusk CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  2. Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  3. Oborski v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  4. Coffin v. LaskauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  5. Michael Papa Associates v. JulianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Babiarz v. Hartford Special, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  2. Gibbs v. MaseConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  3. Angel v. Orlando Annulli Sons, Inc., No. 45 69 77 (Jan. 24, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
  4. Kuhn v. Sadinsky, No. Knl-Cv-92-0523165-S (Mar. 14, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API