Legal Opinion
Gibbs v. Mase
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 29, 1987No. 4699PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The plaintiffs, a husband and wife, appeal from the order of the trial court which reduced the sum of a prejudgment remedy of attachment of the defendant’s property. This court previously decided that the appeal was untimely and therefore dismissed the appeal. Gibbs v. Mase, 10 Conn. App. 144, 523 A.2d 506 (1987). After reconsideration, we find that the untimely filing of the appeal was not a jurisdictional defect because of our Supreme Court’s holding in Giordano Construction Co. v. Ross, 182 Conn. 577, 438 A.2d 772 (1980), and that the plaintiff’s appeal was properly before this court.1…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McLaughlin Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- E. J. Hansen Elevator, Inc. v. StollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Prevedini v. Mobil Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. NapoleonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- State v. PattersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Sorisio v. Lenox, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
- State v. DevanneyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.