Legal Opinion

Maloney v. Stetson & Post Mill Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1907No. 6749PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered December 29, 1906, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained by a hooktender in a sawmill'.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

Action for personal injuries. This cause was tried to the court and jury, and a verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff for $4,000. Subsequently, on motion for a new trial, the verdict was reduced to $3,000, and a judgment entered for that amount. The defendant appeals, and alleges that the court erred, (1) in refusing the continuance upon motion of appellant, (2) in refusing to grant a nonsuit; (3) in giving a certain instruction; and also that the verdict is excessive. We shall consider these alleged errors in the order stated.(1) On November 10, 1906, the cause was set for trial for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dossett v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. O'Brien v. Page Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Maggs v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kinston v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Westerlund v. RothschildWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Portland & Seattle Railway Co. v. LaddWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  4. King v. Page Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. City of Kinston v. Atlantic & North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API