Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Page Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1905No. 4952PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for Pierce county, Huston, J., entered May 1, 1903, upon tbe verdict of a jury rendered in favor of tbe defendant by direction of tbe court, after a trial on tbe merits, dismissing an action for personal injuries sustained by one employed as a “dogger” on a saw carriage in defendant’s mill.

1Opinion of the Court

Mount, O. J.

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of defendant, rendered upon motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiffs evidence. Plaintiff appeals.

The material facts, as shown by the pleadings and plaintiffs evidence, are briefly as follows: In the year 1902, the respondent owned and operated a sawmill at Buckley, in Pierce county, Washington, for manufacturing lumber. The appellant, William O’Brien, was employed in the mill as a “dogger.” This employment required the appellant to ride backwards and forwards on the saw carriage, and to attach the “dogs” to the log on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sayward v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Allend v. Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
  3. McDonough v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Nelson v. S. Willey Steamship & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Dossett v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Campbell v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. Buss v. WachsmithWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. McLeod v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API