Legal Opinion

Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided January 4, 1985No. Civ. A. C81-875A, C81-1398A and C82-247APublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

FORRESTER, District Judge.

These cases are now pending before the court on three motions filed by defendants Southern Medical Supply Company and Edison E. Lyle. For the reasons which appear herein, all three motions are DENIED.

A. MOTION TO DECLARE LUND-QUIST AND MOTION MANUFACTURING UNREPRESENTED.

In a motion filed in open court on October 2, 1984, defendants Lyle and Southern Medical requested that in the event that neither Lundquist nor Motion Manufacturing, nor any counsel representing them, appeared at the status conference scheduled for that day, this court declare those two…

2Cases cited20 opinions

Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
Woods v. Interstate Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
Cathy Ann Glater v. Eli Lilly & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
Funding Systems Leasing Corporation v. Garland B. Pugh, Sr., Individually and D/B/A Georgia Tractor and Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Index Fund, Inc. v. HagopianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
International Capital Equipment Ltd. v. Computer Atlanta, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1989