Legal Opinion

Coty v. U. S. Slicing MacHine Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 14, 1978No. 76-407, 76-408 consPublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SEIDENFELD

delivered the opinion of the court:

The plaintiff, then age 15, was injured while operating a meat slicing machine on the premises of her employer the Yankee Doodle Dandy restaurant, a fast-food franchisee, located in Elgin. As material here she sued the defendant franchisor, Yankee Doodle House, Inc., on the theory of negligence and willful and wanton misconduct and sued the defendant, U.S. Slicing Machine Company, Inc., the manufacturer of the machine, on the theory of strict liability in tort. The cases were tried together before a jury. At the close of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Williams v. Brown Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Bexiga v. Havir Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  4. Reese v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Scott v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hoffnagle v. McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  4. Little v. Howard Johnson Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Myszkowski v. Penn Stroud Hotel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API