Legal Opinion

Hoffnagle v. McDonald's Corp.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 19, 1994No. 93-1009PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGIVERIN, Chief Justice.

The question here is whether a franchisor may be held liable for injuries suffered by its franchisee’s employee as a result of an assault by third parties. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendant franchisor, McDonald’s Corporation, concluding as a matter of law that defendant owed no duty of security to the franchisee’s employee, plaintiff Dana Annette Hoffnagle. We agree with the district court that the defendant franchisor did not retain sufficient control of the business operation so as to give rise to a duty in this case. Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sankey v. RichenbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  2. Porter v. Iowa Power and Light CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. Little v. Howard Johnson Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Coty v. U. S. Slicing MacHine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. Hayman v. Ramada Inn, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Shaffer v. Acme Limestone Co., Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Anderson v. Douglas & Lomason Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  5. Kerl v. Dennis Rasmussen, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API