State v. Lake Geneva Lanes, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
The question for our determination is whether a pinball machine which provides free plays as a reward to a player as a result of luck (plus some skill) is a “gambling machine” under sec. 945.01 (3), Stats.
The trial judge concluded that it was a gambling machine, and we agree. The legislative pronouncements together with the rulings heretofore made by this court make it clear that the reward of a free game is “something of value,” as a matter of law. State v. Jaskie (1944), 245 Wis. 398, 14 N. W. (2d) 148; Milwaukee v. Burns (1937), 225 Wis. 296, 274 N. W. 273; Milwaukee v. Johnson (1927), 192…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wigton's ReturnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- City of Milwaukee v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Giomi v. ChaseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Milwaukee v. BurnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Steely v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Amusement, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming DevicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- State v. WassickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1972
- Automatic Music & Vending Corp. v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. HahnCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.