Legal Opinion

City of Milwaukee v. Burns

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1937PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaRtin, J.

This action is to recover a penalty for violation of section 1069 of the Milwaukee Code of 1914, which section provides:

“No person shall possess, keep, own, operate, use or cause to be kept, operated or used in any room, tent, booth, shed, *298tavern, building, inclosure or upon any premises, or part thereof, or in any place within the city of Milwaukee any clock, joker, tape, or slot machine, or other device of any kind or nature whatsoever, upon, in, by or through which money is or may be staked or hazarded, or into which money is or may be played or paid upon chance, or upon the result of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Ellison v. . LavinNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. City of Milwaukee v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  3. City of Neenah v. KruegerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. De Vries v. DyeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Shapiro v. MossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. One Pinball Machine Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  2. Grognet v. Fox Valley Trucking ServiceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State Ex Rel. Dussault v. KilburnMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State v. WileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  5. City of Neenah v. AlsteenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API