Legal Opinion
Fish v. Igoe
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 15, 2004No. AC 24008PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WEST, J.
The plaintiff, Charles W. Fish, appeals pro se from the judgment of the trial court affirming the family support magistrate’s denial of his motion to modify an order to pay child support.1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that (1) the Superior Court did not have jurisdiction to modify a child support order originally rendered in Massachusetts, (2) the family support magistrate, Susan S. Reynolds, improperly retried issues that already had been decided by a Massachusetts court, (3) the trial court improperly failed to consider additional evidence pursuant to General Statutes §…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Unkelbach v. McNarySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Isaac v. Truck Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Prial v. PrialConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trinity United Methodist Church of Springfield, Massachusetts v. LevesqueConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Fewtrell v. FewtrellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Arena v. ArenaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Cote v. MachabeeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. McCarrollConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.