Legal Opinion
Swearingen v. Honeywell, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 15, 2002No. CIVIL ACTION 01-2040-GTVPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VanBEBBER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff, Dora Swearingen, 1 brings this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”), and Kansas state law, alleging that Defendant, Honeywell, Inc. (“Honeywell”), is barred by the doctrine of estoppel from denying benefits to her under her deceased husband’s pension plan and that Defendant breached its fiduciary duty as administrator of the plan. The case is before the court on Motion of Defendant Honeywell to Dismiss with Prejudice (Doc. 20). For the reasons set forth below,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Beach v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Malloy v. Mulkey Tire, Inc. (In Re Universal Factoring Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2002
- Larson v. Safeguard Properties, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
- Aks v. United Missouri BankDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Banks v. Armed Forces BankDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.