Legal Opinion

Aks v. United Missouri Bank

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 7, 2004No. CIV.A. 03-2125-DJWPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WAXSE, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (doc. 7). Defendant moves to dismiss Plaintiffs action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Defendant contends that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) 1 provides the exclusive remedies for the wrongful conduct alleged in Plaintiffs lawsuit. Defendant argues that Plaintiffs allegations, even if true, fail to state a cause of action under ERISA and that the case should therefore be dismissed.

I. Background…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tullis v. UMB Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API