Legal Opinion

Maturo v. Scranton

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 22, 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This case concerns the sufficiency under the Statute of Frauds of a written contract for the sale of real property with an open-ended mortgage contingency clause. The plaintiff, Ferdinand G. Maturo, brought an action to compel specific performance and to recover monetary damages for breach of a contract to convey certain real estate. He sued the defendant Charles H. Scranton, the original seller, and, by amendment, the defendants Anthony M. Limoneelli, Mary J. Limoneelli, the Branford Savings Bank, and the Connecticut Bank and Trust Company, all of whom were subsequent transferees of an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Montanaro v. PandolfiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  2. Stern & Co. v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  3. Gurfein v. WerbelovskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dart & Bogue Co. v. SlosbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Booth v. FlanaganConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  3. Naugatuck Savings Bank v. FiorenziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Pieretti v. Silk, No. 63316 (Apr. 8, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API