Naugatuck Savings Bank v. Fiorenzi
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a mortgagee is entitled to foreclose an open-end mortgage purporting to secure the obligation of a mortgagor who is secondarily liable for an open-end loan when the mortgage deed fails to comply with the provisions of General Statutes § 49-4b.1 The plaintiff, *297Naugatuck Savings Bank, initiated proceedings in the Superior Court to foreclose its mortgage on certain property that the defendant, Cynthia A. Sodlosky, had mortgaged to the plaintiff in 1989. 2 After a trial, the court concluded that the plaintiff was not entitled to a judgment of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re Valerie D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Lynn v. Haybuster Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Fleming v. GarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Dart & Bogue Co. v. SlosbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Fleet National Bank v. Omni Industries, No. Cv-98-0490001-S (Oct. 10, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000