Legal Opinion

Naugatuck Savings Bank v. Fiorenzi

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 21, 1995No. 15083PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a mortgagee is entitled to foreclose an open-end mortgage purporting to secure the obligation of a mortgagor who is secondarily liable for an open-end loan when the mortgage deed fails to comply with the provisions of General Statutes § 49-4b.1 The plaintiff, *297Naugatuck Savings Bank, initiated proceedings in the Superior Court to foreclose its mortgage on certain property that the defendant, Cynthia A. Sodlosky, had mortgaged to the plaintiff in 1989. 2 After a trial, the court concluded that the plaintiff was not entitled to a judgment of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re Valerie D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Lynn v. Haybuster Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Fleming v. GarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Dart & Bogue Co. v. SlosbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New Milford Savings Bank v. JajerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Fleet National Bank v. Omni Industries, No. Cv-98-0490001-S (Oct. 10, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API