Legal Opinion

Terrace Irrigation District v. Braiden

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 27, 1933No. 12,844PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

At the close of the hearing in this case the trial court rendered an opinion in which are fully and fairly stated the issues involved and a recital of the facts of the controversy as it found them to be. The opinion states that this is a mandamus action under the provisions of our Code of Civil Procedure, growing out of the following facts: In 1906, the La Jara Meadows Land and Reservoir Company, a corporation, which was the owner of certain so-called irrigation water rights, gave to the state board of land commissioners of the state of Colorado a deed thereof which recites that the grantor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Northern Colorado Irrigation Co. v. PouppirtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  2. People Ex Rel. Denver v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. HinderliderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  2. People ex rel. Park Reservoir Co. v. HinderliderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  3. North Poudre Irrigation Co. v. HinderliderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  4. Davis v. Pensioners Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  5. State v. AguilarNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API