Legal Opinion

Davis v. Pensioners Protective Ass'n

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 23, 1943No. 15,140PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Young

Defendants in error, herein designated as plaintiffs, instituted an action in mandamus in the district court of the City and County of Denver to compel plaintiffs in error, defendants in the district court and herein designated as defendants, to transfer to the old age pension fund of the State of Colorado, certain sums of money aggregating in amount, $687,757.67, alleged to have been improperly diverted from the old age pension fund to other and illegal uses. Judgment was for plaintiffs. To reverse the judgment defendants prosecute a writ of error in this court.

Plaintiff, Pensioners…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Berssenbrugge v. Luce Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1939
  2. Daugherty v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. The People Ex Rel. Dannat v. . ComptrollerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. In Re Interrogatories of the GovernorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  5. State Ex Rel. Keefe v. CottonSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pensioners Protective Ass'n v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  2. State Ex Rel. Ebke v. Board of Educational Lands & FundsNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. McNichols v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  4. Gonzales v. SheaDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1970
  5. Young v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API