Legal Opinion

Northern Colorado Irrigation Co. v. Pouppirt

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 7, 1910No. 5900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Adams District Court — ITon. Frank T. Johnson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

This is an action of mandamus to compel defendant to carry in its canal and deliver to plaintiffs water for irrigating their agricultural lands. To the judgment awarding the peremptory writ defendant prosecutes error. As the application was on notice, the alternative writ of mandamus was not granted, and upon final hearing the peremptory writ issued in *491the first instance. The petition for the writ alleges, in substance, that plaintiffs are owners of agricultural lands which lie under defendant’s canal, and sets up facts which plaintiffs say constitute them appropriated of water from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. Northern Colorado Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  2. Combs v. Agricultural Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  3. Townsend v. Fulton Irrigating Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  4. Agricultural Ditch Co. v. RollinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. Montezuma Water & Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Northern Colorado Irrigation Co. v. PouppirtColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Terrace Irrigation District v. BraidenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
  3. Northern Colorado Irrigation Co. v. PouppirtColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. People Ex Rel. Denver v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  5. Arnold v. CareySupreme Court of Colorado · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API