Legal Opinion

Peoples National Bank v. Southern Surety Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 20, 1930No. Docket No. 4102PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the defendant in an action prosecuted by the plaintiff to recover on a surety bond for money advanced or loaned to a contractor in the performance of work on a public building in the city of Los Angeles.

The record shows that a contracting firm doing business under the name of Hennessy Bros. & Company, Incorporated, obtained a contract for the building of a concrete warehouse for the city of Los Angeles, and in pursuance of an act of the legislature approved May 10, 1919 (Stats. 1919, p. 487), a surety bond was given by the defendant corporation.

Omitti…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Hardaway v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. United States ex rel. Fidelity Nat. Bank v. RundleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
  4. Puget Sound State Bank v. GallucciWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. State ex rel. Leavenworth State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. A. L. Young MacHinery Co. v. CuppsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Century Indemnity Co. v. Shunk Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  3. Primo Team, Inc. v. Blake Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Norton v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  5. Anderson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API