Legal Opinion
Norton v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 3, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMehaeey, J.
This is an appeal from a decree of the Desha Chancery Court in favor of the appellee. In August, 1926, J. T. Carr entered into a contract with the State Highway Commission to- construct a road in Desha County 21.18 miles in length. The contractor executed a bond with the Maryland Casualty Company as surety for the faithful performance of the contract and the payment of all bills for labor and material entering into the construction of said road or used in the course of the performalice of the work. The contractor did not get estimates as he claimed he should have gotten, and he was unable to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- First National Bank of Chisholm v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Goode v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- American Bank & Trust Co. v. LangstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Peoples National Bank v. Southern Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ayres & Graves v. EllisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Integon Indemnity Corp. v. BullSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Schlumpf v. ShofnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Schuman v. StevensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Johnson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.