Legal Opinion

Lafean v. American Caramel Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1921No. Appeal, No. 79PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal, No. 79, Jan. T., 1921, by defendant, from decree of C. P. York Co., April T., 1916, No. 1, on bill in equity, in case of Daniel F. Lafean and Stuart B. Lafean v. American Caramel Co., and C. R. Weedan et al. Bill in equity for injunction, specific performance, account, discovery, etc. ■ Tbe opinion of tbe Supreme Court states the facts. The court entered a decree for complainants. The American Caramel Co., defendant, appealed.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 79, Jan. T., 1921, by defendant, from decree of C. P. York Co., April T., 1916, No. 1, on bill in equity, in case of Daniel F. Lafean and Stuart B. Lafean v. American Caramel Co., and C. R. Weedan et al. Bill in equity for injunction, specific performance, account, discovery, etc. ■ Tbe opinion of tbe Supreme Court states the facts. The court entered a decree for complainants. The American Caramel Co., defendant, appealed. Error assigned, among others, was decree, quoting it.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

The American Caramel Company and the Rodda Candy Company are Pennsylvania corporations, the latter located at Lancaster and the former at Lancaster and York. In 1914 the plaintiffs were officers of the Caramel Company, Daniel F. Lafean being its president and general manager and his son, Stuart B. Lafean, its secretary and treasurer. During the summer of that year parties interested in the Caramel Company discussed the advisability of its buying the stock of the Rodda Company, *279and, with that end in view, one William C. Bidlack, who was interested in both…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Barnes Laundry Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Allison's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  3. Bierbower's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  4. Adams's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  5. Masson & Besanson's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Falsetti v. Local Union No. 2026, United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Piercing Pagoda, Inc. v. HoffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Brenner v. SukenikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Williams v. Finlaw, Mueller & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Commonwealth v. RyanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API