Pei-Herng Hor v. Ching-Wu "Paul" Chu
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge PROST.
Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge REYNA. PROST, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Pei-Herng Hor (“Hor”) and Ruling Meng (“Meng”) filed this suit against Appellee Ching-Wu Chu (“Chu”) under 35 U.S.C. § 256 for correction of inventorship of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,056,866 (“'866 patent”) and 7,709,418 (“'418 patent”). The district court granted Chu’s motion for summary judgment, finding that Hor’s and Meng’s claims were barred by laches or, alternatively, by equitable estoppel. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part, reverse in part,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Complaint v. Scimed Life Systems, Inc., and Robert L. Hess, Cross-Complainant/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Eli Lilly and Company v. Aradigm Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Kiser v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ferring B.V. v. Allergan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Shell Oil Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Ferring B.V. v. Allergan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- High Point Sarl v. Sprint Nextel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Ferring B.V. v. Allergan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.