Legal Opinion

Gardiner v. Gardiner

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMccarthy, J.

This is an action brought by respondents through their guardian ad litem to quiet their title to 80 acres of land. Appellant, in addition to his answer, filed a cross-complaint in which he seeks to quiet his title to the same land. Respondent and Rose B. Gardiner were husband and wife. They were endeavoring to divide the community property. Respondents are their minor children. Mary O’Roke is the mother of Rose B. Gardiner and grandmother of respondents. Ou October 17, 1918, Mary O’Roke executed and acknowledged a warranty deed to the 80 acres in question to appellant, reciting a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ware v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Stanton v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Vogel v. PekocIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Sellers v. GreerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Cannon v. HandleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Milner v. Earl Fruit Co. of the NorthwestIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Alexander v. O'NEILArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  3. International Harvester Co. of America v. BeverlandIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Nelson v. GishIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Moslander v. BeldonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API