Legal Opinion
Celli v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 21, 1995No. 95 Civ. 1593 (JGK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge:
The defendants, Metro-North Commuter Railroad (“Metro-North”) and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA”), have moved to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on the ground that the claims are barred under the applicable Statute of Limitations. For the reasons explained below, the defendants’ motion is granted.
The plaintiffs’ complaint arises out of injuries Mr. Celli allegedly suffered while he was disembarking from a train at the Peekskill train station on December 28, 1993. Mr. Celli claims…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Triangle Underwriters, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc. And Honeywell Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Monaghan v. SZS 33 Associates, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Zaiman v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Rose v. Metro North Commuter RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Bak v. Metro-North RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Islam v. MelisaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020