Legal Opinion
East Coast Novelty Co., Inc. v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 2, 1992No. 90 Civ. 2108 (RWS)PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants City of New York (the “City”), Police Department of the City of New York (“Police Department”), Property Clerk’s Office of the Police Department of the City of New York (“Property Clerk”), Carl W. Wendt (“Wendt”), and Sandra Vazquez (“Office Vazquez”, collectively the “Defendants”) have moved to dismiss the complaint plaintiff East Coast Novelty Company, Inc. (“East Coast”) has brought against them. Defendants all move for summary judgment on grounds that East Coast was provided with more than adequate due process and that the claims are collaterally…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Emerson v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Dove v. Fordham UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Koulkina v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Philippeaux v. North Central Bronx HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Baker v. WillettDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.