Legal Opinion

Prokop v. Mlady

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1939No. 30617PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lightner, District Judge.

Suit on a promissory note executed by Charles S. Mlady and Charles Pavlik, Sr. Mlady made all the payments and Pavlik pleads the statute of limitations. The finding was in favor of Pavlik, and plaintiff appeals.

The note was dated April 7, 1925, due in two years, and plaintiff alleged in his petition that interest was paid up to and including April 7, 1930. Suit was filed March 3, 1933. Plaintiff claims that the note did not outlaw by reason of a provision in it to the effect that payment may be extended from time to time by agreement without notice and that after such…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wright v. BarneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State Insurance v. Buckstaff Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Backes v. SchlickNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Herbison v. TaylorNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Keeler v. ManwarrenNebraska Supreme Court · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Todd v. Board of Educational Lands and FundsNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Lincoln Joint Stock Land Bank v. BarnesNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Gibson v. Koutsky-Brennan-Vana Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Smick v. LangvardtNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Snake River Land Co. v. Utah-Idaho Sugar Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API