Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Hyundai Motor Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided December 23, 1992No. 01-91-00498-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OLIVER-PARROTT, Chief Justice.

Appellant, Chloe J. Chandler (Chandler), pursuant to Tex.R.Civ.P. 76a(8), appeals from the trial court’s protective order restricting disclosure of documents produced by appellee, Hyundai Motor Company (Hyundai), to examination and use by only trial counsel, court reporters, and technical experts. This Court dismissed the appeal on jurisdictional grounds. Chandler v. Hyundai Motor Co., No. 01-91-00498-CV, 1991 WL 148717 (Tex.App—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 8, 1991) (not yet reported) (Chandler I). The supreme court reversed the dismissal and remanded the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hudson v. WakefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Eli Lilly and Co. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, & Smith, Inc. v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. HBA East, Ltd. v. JEA Boxing Co., Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  5. Chandler v. Hyundai Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Title Source, Inc., Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, and Houston Forward Times v. Housecanary, Inc. F/K/A Canary Analytics, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API