Legal Opinion

Zangerle v. Evatt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1942No. 28923 and 28924PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

In these appeals, the county auditors of Cuyahoga and Lucas counties seek to have the court review rule No. 2 promulgated by the Tax Commissioner under authority of Section 1464-4, General Code, and related statutes. The question at once arises both as to the propriety and jurisdiction of this court in the premises. Counsel were invited to and have submitted briefs in respect of this court’s jurisdiction to entertain these appeals.

It has been strongly urged here that appeal as of right in these cases is granted by Section 5611-2, General Code. We are of the opinion that this section…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Stanton v. State Tax CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Davis v. State Ex Rel. KennedyOhio Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Fortner v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. M. J. Kelley Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. GranderOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State ex rel. Republic Steel Corp. v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API