Legal Opinion

Patecky v. FRIEND

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1960PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

(Pro Tempore)

Defendants appeal from a decree in equity based on findings of fact and conclusions of law of the circuit court for Multnomah county, holding that plaintiff, Blanche F. Patecky, is entitled to the entire net estate of Samuel Friend, deceased, by virtue of an oral agreement between that decedent and his former wife, Emma, whereby they contracted to leave all their property respectively to the survivor of them, and the survivor to leave all his or her property to plaintiff, their daughter and only child.

Defendant Lillian A. Friend was the second wife of and is the widow of Samuel…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Owens v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Baker v. SyfrittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Bedal v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Wagner v. Savage, as Adm'rOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Caveny v. ASHEIMOregon Supreme Court · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pangarova v. NicholsWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Cameron v. BensonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Shell Oil Co. v. BoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Gregory v. Estate of GregorySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Portland Section of Council of Jewish Women v. Sisters of Charity of ProvidenceOregon Supreme Court · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API