Legal Opinion

Sekata v. Federal Express Corporation

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided November 6, 2020No. 5:20-cv-00203Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION VIOLET SEKATA, ) CASE NO. 5:20-cv-203 ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) JUDGE SARA LIOI ) vs. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ) ORDER OF REMAND FEDEX AKA FEDEX GROUND AKA ) FEDEX GROUND TRANSPORTATION ) AKA FEDEXX RISK MANAGEMENT, ) ) DEFENDANT. ) Presently before the Court are the following motions: (1) plaintiff’s motion to remand this action to state court (Doc. No. 8 [“MTR”]); (2) defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 17 [“MJP”]); and (3) plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint, instanter. (Doc. No. 13 [“MTA”].) Each…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Musson Theatrical, Inc., and Modernage Photo Service, Inc., for Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. American Airlines, Inc. v. WolensSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API