Legal Opinion
State v. Barber
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided December 28, 1962No. File No. MV 10-6624PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while his right to operate was suspended, in violation of General Statutes § 14-215. The case was tried on an agreed statement of facts, and in its memorandum of decision the court set out the reasons for its finding of guilty. This memorandum was not in accordance with Circuit Court Rule 7.30.2. While we do not sanction this irregularity, we shall, in fairness to the defendant, accept the procedure followed by the parties and adopted by the court and consider the assignments of error as presented. Mayron's Bake Shops,Inc. v. Arrow…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Nehring v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Mayron's Bake Shops, Inc. v. Arrow Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Dempsey v. TynanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Spurbeck v. StattonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- Thornhill v. KirkmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. TeasleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. BaltromitisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1967
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- State v. McCallumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- State v. McCallumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991