State v. McCallum
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1ConcurrenceChasanow, Judge
I concur in the Per Curiam opinion of the Court, but, since the Court is reversing McCallum’s conviction because the judge erroneously failed to instruct the jury that mens rea is necessary to convict for driving while suspended, I believe we should for the guidance of the trial court elaborate on the mens rea that would be necessary to convict.
The Court of Special Appeals defined mens rea with a quote from Judge Learned Hand:
“Ordinarily one is not guilty of a crime unless he is aware of the existence of all those facts which make his conduct criminal. That awareness is all that is meant by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Charles Demore JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. CrimminsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- United States v. Michael A. Picciandra, United States of America v. A. Russell Lucid, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Mirahmad FerozCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- McCallum v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.