City of Cleveland v. Pugh
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Patricia Ann Blackmon, Judge.
Public indecency is a sex offense in Ohio, noscitur a sociis. The question before us is whether the Ohio General Assembly intended to make sex offenders out of individuals who urinate alfresco, even if they take precautions to avoid discovery. In this case, defendant-appellant, Charles Pugh, appeals his conviction for public indecency and assigns the following errors for our review:
“I. The court erred in convicting Pugh of indecent exposure under Cleveland Municipal Code Section 619.07 (Ohio Revised Code Section 2907.09) because this Code section does not apply to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of Vermilion v. StevensonOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by7 opinions
- Armengau v. ClineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- State v. FreyOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- City of Columbus v. BreerOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- City of Highland Heights v. GrischkanOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. BriersOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.