Legal Opinion
Armengau v. Cline
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 1, 2001No. 99-4544PublishedCited by 169 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.
Following his arrest in December 1996 for disorderly conduct after a sheriffs deputy observed him urinating in a parking lot, Plaintiff filed a pro se complaint in the Marion County Court of Common Pleas seeking damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 from the arresting officer, a second sheriffs deputy on the scene, the county jailer, the sheriff, and the Marion County Commissioners. Defendants removed the action to federal court, and filed them answer, claiming immunity from suit. Plaintiff did not respond. The individual Defendants moved to dismiss pursuant to Rule…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by169 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Dingle v. BioPort Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2003
- Doe v. University of CincinnatiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
- Bricker v. R & a PIZZA, INC.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Simmerman v. Ocwen Financial & Mortgage Services, Inc. (In re Simmerman)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Kloss v. RBS Citizens, N.A.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.