Legal Opinion
City of Columbus v. Breer
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 15, 2003No. 02AP-952 (REGULAR CALENDAR)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lazarus, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, city of Columbus, appeals from the August 29, 2002 entry of the Franklin County Municipal Court granting defendant-appellee Albert Breer’s motion to dismiss. For the following reasons, we agree with the city of Columbus and reverse and remand the decision of the trial court.
{¶ 2} On April 21, 2002, appellee was attending a party at 109 Chittenden Avenue in Columbus, Ohio. Appellee walked to the side of the house and proceeded to urinate. Appellee’s actions were observed by police officers. Appellee was charged with violating Columbus City Code…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sears v. WeimerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Provident Bank v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. S.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Columbus-Suburban Coach Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Bernardini v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Benjamin v. Credit General Ins., Unpublished Decision (3-29-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. BriersOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- State v. AlsupOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. MaleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2026