Legal Opinion

State v. D.H.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 18, 2000No. 44582-1-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Becker, A.C.J.

— The juvenile court found D.H. guilty of one count of sexual exploitation of a minor after he videotaped a female high school classmate while she exposed her breasts to him. On appeal, D.H. has failed to sustain his burden of demonstrating that the statutes defining sexual exploitation of a minor are unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, either facially or as applied in this case. We also reject D.H.’s contention that the juvenile court lacked authority to impose a no-contact order as a condition of community supervision. Accordingly, we affirm the adjudication of guilt and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. AlvarezWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. City of Seattle v. HuffWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. ChesterWashington Supreme Court · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Born v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. K.H.-H.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Born v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. K. H.-H.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. K. H.-H.Washington Supreme Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API