Born v. Thompson
Washington Supreme Court
1Dissent
¶45 (dissenting) — A court may commit a misdemeanant defendant for mental health treatment and competency restoration upon finding that the defendant is “not competent”21 and that he or she has either “[a] history ... or a pending charge of one or more violent acts.”22 The court’s competency determination is made “following” *770its receipt of the mental health evaluation report mandated in RCW 10.77.060. RCW 10.77.090(1)(a). That report is the product of a prior court-ordered commitment of the defendant for a mental health examination, a commitment “not to exceed fifteen days from the time of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.