Royal Development Co., Ltd., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
In this case, we are confronted with apparently conflicting labor law precedents. The legal issues are significant and require our careful analysis. The case stems from the entry of an order by the National Labor Relations Board (the Board) holding Royal Development Company (Royal) in violation of subsections 8(a)(1), 8(a)(3), and 8(a)(4) of the National Labor Relations Act (the Act), 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1), (3), and (4), for its refusal to rehire Schmidt, both because he engaged in union and other protected, concerted activity, and because he filed an unfair labor…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. J. Weingarten, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wright Line, a Division of Wright Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 103, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kenneth P. Prill v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Abbey's Transportation Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Henning v. Industrial Welfare CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Idaho Falls Consolidated Hospitals, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.