MacLean v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
From judgments in favor of defendants respectively, entered after motions for nonsuit were granted, plaintiff appeals on a settled statement.
The question presented is the sufficiency of the evidence to show negligence upon the part of the respective defendants.
General Facts
The facts referring to the negligence of the particular defendant will be discussed later, and, as we are required to do in nonsuits, the facts and the reasonable inferences therefrom most strongly in favor of plaintiff will be given. The action is for injuries claimed to have been sustained by plaintiff while getting off a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Boa v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Rys.California Supreme Court · 1920
- O'Malley v. Laurel Line Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Choquette v. Key System Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Colgrove v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Frassi v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Arpin v. Santa Clara Valley Transportation AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Parker v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- MacLean v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Smith v. Portland Traction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.