Legal Opinion
Simon v. KEYSPAN CORP.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 22, 2011No. 10 Civ. 5437(SAS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRAA. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge:
Charles Simon (“Simon” or “plaintiff’) brings this action against KeySpan Corporation (“KeySpan”) and Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. (“Morgan Stanley”) (collectively, the “defendants”) pursuant to Section 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act (the “Clayton Act”) on his own behalf and on behalf of other similarly situated consumers. 1 Simon is a retail consumer of electricity in New York City. KeySpan is a provider of wholesale electricity and electricity generating capacity (“ICAP” or “installed capacity”). 2 Morgan Stanley is a provider of…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Simon v. Keyspan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Prime Mover Capital Partners L.P. v. Elixir Gaming Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Prime Mover Capital Partners L.P. v. Elixir Gaming Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- United States v. StanleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Edward Skolarus, et al. v. Bloomberg, L.P. and Bloomberg Index Services, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.