Donaldson v. Abraham
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered May 23, 1911, dismissing an action to recover a deposit on a bid for county work, upon granting a nonsuit in a trial to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
In the early part of the year 1911, the county commissioners of King county advertised for bids for the construction of a county road, over a designated route, according to certain plans and specifications. The specifications described the work in detail, setting forth the different kinds of work that would be required to complete the highway, and the estimated quantity of each kind thereof. Each bid was required to be in one lump sum for the completed work, and was to be accompanied by the certified check of the bidder, to be forfeited if the bidder failed to enter into a contract should his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Co. v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Board of School Commissioners v. BenderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- Harran v. FoleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by15 opinions
- James T. Taylor & Son, Inc. v. Arlington Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Mayor of Baltimore v. DeLuca-Davis Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- State Highway Commission v. State Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Rainey v. QuigleyOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Boise Junior College District v. Mattefs Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.