Harran v. Foley
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Brown County. Replevin. The complaint was in the usual form. The answer was a general denial. The facts shown upon the trial are stated in the opinion. There was a verdict and judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
This is an action of replevin, brought by the appellant to recover the possession of ten head of cattle, which he claims to have purchased of the respondent, and which the respondent refused to deliver to him. The case was tried by a jury, and the verdict was in fdvor of the defendant. The facts upon which the case turned are substantially as follows:
The plaintiff claims that on the day he purchased the cattle in question the defendant had them in town for sale; that after there had been some talk between him and the defendant about the sale, they came together and the defendant first offered…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Steinmeyer v. SchroeppelIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Rainey v. QuigleyOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Board of School Commissioners v. BenderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- Singer v. Grand Rapids Match Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Donaldson v. AbrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.