Legal Opinion

Maliszewski v. Rendon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 6, 1988No. 02147PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying appellants’ motion for a new trial. Appellees were granted summary judgment at the close of appellants’ case, the trial court finding that appellants had failed to prove an essential element of their case. 1

Appellants present six issues for our consideration: (1) whether their informed consent case was properly dismissed for failure to provide expert testimony asserting appellants had suffered injury additional to the back surgery itself; (2) whether a non-surgeon physician was properly dismissed where he provided inaccurate information…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cooper v. RobertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Neal by Neal v. LuSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Simmons v. MullenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Festa v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Jozsa v. HottensteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. Bazaz-SehgalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Montgomery v. Bazaz-SehgalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Grabowski v. QuigleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Kovalev v. SowellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Haviland v. Kline & Specter, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API