Maliszewski v. Rendon
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order denying appellants’ motion for a new trial. Appellees were granted summary judgment at the close of appellants’ case, the trial court finding that appellants had failed to prove an essential element of their case. 1
Appellants present six issues for our consideration: (1) whether their informed consent case was properly dismissed for failure to provide expert testimony asserting appellants had suffered injury additional to the back surgery itself; (2) whether a non-surgeon physician was properly dismissed where he provided inaccurate information…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cooper v. RobertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Neal by Neal v. LuSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Simmons v. MullenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Festa v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Jozsa v. HottensteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Montgomery v. Bazaz-SehgalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Montgomery v. Bazaz-SehgalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Grabowski v. QuigleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Kovalev v. SowellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Haviland v. Kline & Specter, P.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.