Legal Opinion
Redd v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 12, 2008No. 07-718CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The issue for decision is whether plaintiffs state compensable claims for back pay, liquidated damages, and interest, attorneys’ fees and costs under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (2000) (the “FLSA”), related to home-to-work commuting. Briefing is completed and argument is deemed unnecessary.
FACTS
The FLSA was enacted, in part, to compensate government employees for all hours worked for their employer, stipulating a one- and-one-half pay rate…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. CokeSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Atlas Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Coltec Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- William Eugene Owen, as of the Estate of Caroline Pearson Payne v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Forbes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Crusan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Morgan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Stocum v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Boyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.