Legal Opinion

In re Drayton

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 1, 2004No. 25830PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent pursuant to Rule 21, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. In the agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to the sanctions provided by Rule 7, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. We accept the agreement and indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law in this state. The facts, as set forth in the agreement, are as follows.

FACTS

I

In September 2001, Complainant A retained respondent for the purposes of filing a Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re DraytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. In re DraytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  2. In the Matter of Joel F. GeerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API