Legal Opinion

In re Drayton

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 1, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Petitioner has been charged with possession of crack cocaine in violation of S.C.Code Ann. § 44-53-375 (Supp.2001). The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking the Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(a), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, because he has been charged with a serious crime. The petition also seeks appointment of an attorney to protect the interests of respondent’s clients pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent is suspended from the practice of law in this State until further…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re DraytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re DraytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API